InvestorsHub Logo

Pollux

01/24/21 10:31 AM

#209306 RE: Pollux #209304

Ill note one more thing - the AI would take into consideration the length of time we have been at these prices vs. other times. And look at the volatility of the past vs. time spent..

ie; linear vs. variability(instability) - or something like that..

Basically, 10yrs on consolidation with 3-4 times we hit these prices we did 2x/4x in returns - yet, we have been at these prices(summer 20 hitting 10yr past lows) for much longer than in past over 10yrs. This creates amplitude effect based on past volatility.

The derivative algo would implore the past multiples - time/price - and conclude this time its lagging said premise.

Watts Watt

01/24/21 2:25 PM

#209334 RE: Pollux #209304

If I were to bet new money,
would it be on BK
or Becomes Something (BS)...

Hmmmm, tough choice.

Almosthere

01/24/21 4:30 PM

#209340 RE: Pollux #209304

“The chart has been skipping on bottom for too long - either LQMT goes BK or it becomes something now.. bottom line.”

We burn through less than 3 million a year and have 28 million plus a 8 million dollar building paid off.

Please explain in detail your THEORY of how LQMT could go bankrupt?