InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Meowza

01/19/21 4:56 PM

#320077 RE: Abe1234 #320075

Maybe if some of its cheerleaders could have resisted going waaaaaaaaaaay off message. Then hiding behind it as a hey all do i still fit in mechanic.
icon url

zmanindc

01/19/21 5:03 PM

#320079 RE: Abe1234 #320075

The issue is not the size of the ask, it’s the reach. We can’t raise this kind of money just using the ihub crew and need to reach the rest of retail. Retail owns approximately 50% of this stock so more of us need to share the link via Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and anywhere else. If we chipped in money we can take a few moments to post the link on our social media.
icon url

Biobillionair

01/19/21 7:05 PM

#320094 RE: Abe1234 #320075

Thanks Abe. It’s clear funds are going to sit this out, apparently they don’t mind getting justice. Goals have been revised. BB
icon url

rafunrafun

01/19/21 10:38 PM

#320133 RE: Abe1234 #320075

Just throwing an idea out there... and perhaps legal issues prohibit such, money was originally promised to go elsewhere?

But if funds will be clearly short of what is needed and the rule 60 filing will not occur, should funds be redirected to running a lab test of oxidation of gV v V?
icon url

sts66

01/20/21 5:16 PM

#320254 RE: Abe1234 #320075

I just rechecked and now it's only $23k - why did they ask for 4 times that to start out with? Did those pricey expert witnesses have to be let go or were original costs just grossly miscalculated, meaning things progressed faster than expected? I'll admit straight up I have absolutely no idea how many hours this will take and at what cost per hour, just asking honest questions because I don't know how either number was determined.