InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

golden flyer

01/12/21 11:13 AM

#319079 RE: HinduKush #319077

the question is when, why and how does it help the price of the stock? they have been filing and have been granted patents for years-the stock is at 6--how is this different?
icon url

zmanindc

01/12/21 11:18 AM

#319082 RE: HinduKush #319077

This is great and I would love to see something from the company to explain how they plan to leverage the patent in the US. I think this is great for the EU if granted, protects V for another 10 years but the big money is restoring the US rights. Does this do it? Or, do we have to wait for it to hit the Orange Book?
icon url

swg_tdr

01/12/21 11:22 AM

#319083 RE: HinduKush #319077

HinduKush, very neat. Appreciated.
icon url

iwanderer

01/12/21 11:26 AM

#319088 RE: HinduKush #319077

HK EXCELLENT job! Thank you for taking the time and effort to help us understand the important of this ANMRN's newly granted patent
icon url

L0tsaluck2000

01/12/21 11:44 AM

#319093 RE: HinduKush #319077

This suggests a plasma level test between V and gV could be done quickly and show that gv isn't (or isn't likely to be) equivalent to V in therapeutic affect. Then what? While the clinical evidence would be there and a pretty strong theoretical basis, how does one get the FDA to use this knowledge and disallow gV or at least Hikma's gV for Vasepa indication?

Thanks.
icon url

ralphey

01/12/21 11:54 AM

#319096 RE: HinduKush #319077

HK ..playing devils advocate - so just take a higher dose to achieve the necessary plasma level -
icon url

studythosestocks

01/12/21 11:56 AM

#319097 RE: HinduKush #319077

Excellent job. Well done.
icon url

Jasbg

01/12/21 12:48 PM

#319120 RE: HinduKush #319077

HK@ Thanks - very impressive input as always. This new Patent seems to be something that 'on its own' puts Vascepa 'once again' in another league. :)

Jasbg
icon url

breathofthenightwind

01/12/21 12:49 PM

#319121 RE: HinduKush #319077

This is the broadest claim from the ’632 patent:

1. A method of reducing triglyceride levels in a subject on statin therapy and HAVING ATRIAL FIBRILLATION and triglycerides of greater than 500 mg/dl, the method comprising administering to the subject about 4 g of per day of ethyl eicosapentaenoate.

It only covers patients having atrial fibrillation. How many is that? How does Amarin use this claim to stop generics from treating the vast majority of Vascepa patients who do not have atrial fibrillation?
icon url

CaptBeer

01/12/21 3:58 PM

#319185 RE: HinduKush #319077

Excellent Job tying this all together. I was working on this exact project when I read your review. For my own edification, I'll finish what I was doing anyway. :) Thanks
icon url

sstyles

01/12/21 4:30 PM

#319192 RE: HinduKush #319077

So does management need to test the generic product? It seems like we are ultimately going to need the FDA's help even if the generic product is inferior because the generics will just play dumb and insist they are not seeking the REDUCE-IT indication but just going after the MARINE indication.
icon url

sts66

01/12/21 6:13 PM

#319216 RE: HinduKush #319077

Not sure I've seen those words on Tmax before in older patents very similar to this one - I find reading patents give me a headache so I never get all the way thru, that text could have existed prior to this one - but in any case, it doesn't nothing to protect AMRN in the US market, no new patents do.
icon url

Value in the end

01/13/21 10:22 AM

#319274 RE: HinduKush #319077

Thank you HK. Your contributions are very important.