InvestorsHub Logo

Pollux

01/08/21 9:33 PM

#208282 RE: joshuaeyu #208232

Is this related to 5yr Development Period/PLA expiration?

Has Apple, in certain terms, been played by Li to say - "look, but don't touch, taste but don't smell"...there is much of this language in here regarding CE, 106c as you have stated, which still needs to play out via revenue for me to believe that man just walked on that water.

It seems this bodes to the idea of keeping the IP on USA soil through CIP cookie jar while utilizing Eontec as the master of the puppets in order to execute the feasibility of it all, under a contract while keeping Li to hold a final ace that he can keep(USA IP) - all done by a small miniscule % on billions and billions and billions of yearly revenue, forever(perpetual).

This whole CE thing needs to play out, one way or another and Apple/LQMT/Eontec need to come out and say it, imo. Celebrate the advance if you will in front of the world. Or shut the door behind them.

If liquidmetal truly is going to be embodied in Apple and CE revenue will flow to LQMT, $1.00 is easy as the shareprice will simply dislocate from these miniscule pennies and value itself to the reality of the act that occurred. $1B market cap for something more tangible than some grow houses in a midwestern field.