Replies to post #207327 on Liquidmetal Technologies Inc (LQMT)

[The Paraclete]

Am I reading too much into this?

SIX (6)-MONTH DEADLINE: Applicant has six (6) MONTHS from the NOA issue date to file either:
- An SOU, if the applicant is using the mark in commerce (required even if the applicant was using the mark at the time of filing the application, if use basis was not specified originally); OR
- An Extension Request, if the applicant is not yet using the mark in commerce. If an Extension Request is filed, a new request must be filed every six (6) months until the SOU is filed. The applicant may file a total of five (5) extension requests. WARNING: An SOU may not be filed more than thirty-six (36) months from when the NOA issued. The deadline for filing is always calculated from the issue date of the NOA.

Does this mean they intend to file one or more Statements of Use? I.e., that LQMT is anticipating the production of one or more items covered in the filing?

[PayMEmf]

Games! How am I going to sleep now...

“International Class 009: Cellular phones; Mobile phones.
Intent to Use: The applicant has a bona fide intention, and is entitled, to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the identified goods/services.”

[JoTu]

once again games you da man! thanks for your research/posts will have fun reading them.

[joshuaeyu]

This trademark when approved will belong to CIP which is co-owned with Apple.

Note there were initial application in April 2019 then pulled back and amended in July.

Those dates have relationship with Kang lawsuit

Apple does care in the year 2019......

With that being said, why does LQMT joint force then....LQMT does have option to do it independently with post CIP (03/2016) technologies.

Conclusion has to be there is “agreement” between Apple/LQMT/Lugee/Eontec

[joshuaeyu]

It will be good if we can pull the original trademark that LQMT owned originally

Side by side comparison will highlight the “additional market segments” that Lugee and Apple care for.