InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

anders2211

12/19/20 1:32 PM

#340790 RE: exwannabe #340787

I think that is likely the reason Senti mentioned it, just being complete on options to accomplish this.



I think that too, but I would like to know if NWBO dripped that to her.
Probably not I dont think so I think she just mentioned it as an option.
icon url

Poor Man -

12/19/20 2:56 PM

#340798 RE: exwannabe #340787

The shareholder vote would have to be for both, the R/S and any increase in authorized shares taking into effect the reverse split.

If they want to uplist, they will need a R/S to maintain a bid price well above the min bid requirement for Nasdaq or NYSE. But as I’ve said before, for a company that ostensibly wants to uplist, they sure don’t seem to be acting like that’s the plan.

I also tend to believe that holding off on further extension of the suspension period is due to concerns over triggering insider trading violations.

]A vote an an R/S could leave the authorized shares at 1.2B thus an effective raise in the limit.

icon url

Sojourner55

12/19/20 2:59 PM

#340800 RE: exwannabe #340787

Thanks Ex