InvestorsHub Logo

Investor2014

12/18/20 2:40 PM

#288814 RE: Gernee20 #288813

A prespecified objective surrogate endpoint could be very good for the next trial yes.

Changing endpoints for an ongoing trial or even after is unlikely to lead to approval, but has been tried more than once.
When and How Can Endpoints Be Changed after Initiation of a Randomized Clinical Trial?

boi568

12/18/20 2:42 PM

#288816 RE: Gernee20 #288813

Just exploring the possibilities. We should know that this is a Rett slam dunk, statistically, and very possibly elsewhere. May require unusual FDA cooperation. Then you get to an accepted biomarker, like lower cholesterol, and a quicker series of approvals down the road.

XenaLives

12/18/20 5:19 PM

#288836 RE: Gernee20 #288813

Nope, not for Aussie PA. Anavex only needs to present convincing science...

I believe this needs to be a preapproved surrogate endpoint prior to trial start.