InvestorsHub Logo

biosectinvestor

12/17/20 12:14 AM

#339977 RE: Dan88 #339974

I have no doubt they would notify the public, but not because of the 4 day rule. One of the problems a lot of people do is apply things to their reasoning that do not apply. And that makes them feel more comfortable they think, and to assume anything other than that would be grossly illegal.

The law does not protect you to the degree you presume, and that is not the way to reason about the question of whether the company will tell you or not.

I am not rigid Dan, I am just telling you like it is so that you don’t make that mistake. That you’d rather be mistaken and and that you’re not seeing the grey and want everything to be bright line, is not really my problem. But not everyone wants to be lied to to feel comfortable taking risk.

biosectinvestor

12/17/20 12:17 AM

#339978 RE: Dan88 #339974

The point is not that “no news is not good news”. The point is that the idea, which is false, propagates throughout the chat boards and people believe they have rights they do not have.

Sorry dude. When it comes up and someone spreads misinformation on it, because it is one of those viral falsehoods, I’ll probably take a moment to explain why it’s not actually the law.

Why would anyone want to prop up something the know to be likely, for other reasons, with a falsehood? It undermines the truth to do so and the reliability of the source. That some people have so much pride invested in a false idea, I can only explain by what we see in debates generally these days. People seem to have a need to “take a side” irrespective of truth or reality because RE prefer a given idea or perspective. This is one of those situations unfortunately. I chose to take a strong position because someone who held himself out as a lawyer, but an EU lawyer in truth, told people this was a truth and I felt it was important to be sure people knew that that was not an axiom of truth, upon which they could rely... to calculate the safety of their investments...generally. There are other reliable measures. You point to them... why not just say the facts upon which you really rely than to spread i truth to falsely induce reliance on persons who want to believe but want an legal like axiom upon which to rely?

Just rely upon the truth and facts... if people find that inadequate, then that is the reality of the human condition. No fake legal axiom will bridge that gap.

If you don’t want me to discuss it, don’t post a false legal axiom that proves a factual circumstance.