Replies to post #339866 on NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)

[Bright Boy]

TC4now had a great post that supports your comments very well and it is: 339148

[JA2626]

Thank you

Great post

??

[GoodGuyBill]

I NEVER said "That LP is not looking out for retail investors". You can read the full post below.

First, I acknowledged that I do think there is a possibility that

LP/NWBO may be doing some earth shattering work behind the scenes that will result in an immense success.

Second, and contrary to the first point, I admit that:

I cannot ignore the possibility that her work behind the scenes may not be totally aligned with retail shareholders' interest

Furthermore I restated the point:

LP & co may not be working in retail's best interest.

Given the supporting data provided in the post, I can't see how "the possibility that LP may not be working in the retail shareholders' best interest is unfounded.

On one hand we are aware of the outstanding blended interim data that was reported in 2017/18. On the other hand, for 3+ years, we've been told the end of the trial and the release of TLD is near. In July and august we were told to expect TLD in 30 days. In October we had a data-lock PR and all previous explicit dates/timelines disappeared again as if these statements too were never made and to discuss them is unreasonable and frustrating to management. WFT?!

So my point is this: I do think there is a possibility that

LP/NWBO may be doing some earth shattering work behind the scenes that will result in an immense success.

But, I cannot ignore the possibility that her work behind the scenes may not be totally aligned with retail shareholders' interest (Remember Cognate...how NWBO purchased it, equipped it, organized it, financed it all. Now shareholders don't own it and apparently got nothing for it). It is not beyond reason that our interests are not paramount in whatever is going on, here. HappyLibrarian expressed my view best:

Certainly NWBO has to have a motive but with the limited amount of information that comes out of the black box that is NWBO we cannot tell what that reason is. I can only say that historically suppression of information is generally done for the benefit of the few and to the detriment of the many.

Many longs feel buyout negotiations are taking place. I admit buyout negotiations would explain the late SEC filings and the abrupt change in TLD timeline. But any honest retail investor, upon reflecting on NWBO's recent actions, would have to at least entertain the possibility that even if a buyout is presently on the table, LP & co may not be working in retail's best interest.

Have you ever heard of a CEO trying to sell her company while hiding or down-playing all positive developments? Wouldn't someone attempting to sell her company try to put the company in the best light to increase the pps as high as possible BEFORE negotiations? What CEO would not announce the U.K. RA's change in endpoints that lowers the bar for approval...and Germany's... and essentially all of Europe! Why would the CEO purposely downplay any positive developments? I remember almost exactly 2 years ago, LP released the "Updated Interim Data" PR that laid out spectacular day. Directly after laying out unprecedented data, LP states, there was no pathway to approval!?!?!?! What CEO operates in this manner? Why?

Most CEOs would hype company accomplishments up to the line of illegality (some even cross it). Our CEO hides or downplays almost every positive development.

You may disagree with my point but not one person here can say my position is unreasonable or unfounded.

[Karlchen]

i will try to add something what is a bit hard to explain in a foreign language.

People ,

- who are already wealthy, are already 50/60 years old, with an extraordinary aducation, working hard the whole live (it must have been hard, when you think about her many degrees in diff. strains and her business carree) -

have different goals they want to reach in their lives than us, or better: most of us, being on the threshold of being millionaires, or multi millionaires, some mayby billionaires in 6-10 years!

These people still have all what `s with money to buy. They want to do something BIG, maybe going into history, they want to be known for their extraordinary achievements, they do charities, philanthropy and so on. It would be a bad picture for her, and she cant achieve this with fraud to the shareholders, doing a deal behind curtain, or the like.

Sorry, i hope intelligent people (all, here on board) know what i mean, although my "words going out" to explain better.

Perhaps someone can explain this point better, and have the right , special words for that. I learnt it in businness / salesmen school. Their are stairs from the basic things to self-realisation. The like people on the first step are worriing and working to have food and a roof upon their head. if they reach that, the second step is to have better food, a nice home and heating. the third step is a bit of luxury. if that is achieved, next step - they want to have good reputation - working colleges, or beeing president in a local , small football-club, or local potitics
- by the way, as higher it goes, less people are on that stairs/steps!
and so it goes on and on until at the top of the pyramide.
I think LP is there!

That doesnt mean she is a good or a bad person, but if she is (hopefully) on that last step, it should be good for us, good for her and good for the patients