The major difference is that mRNA which is what Pfizer put out is NOT a normal vaccine.
In fact I believe it is currently the ONLY mRNA on the market that was approved.
mRNA is NOT like normal vaccines, where you take a weakened or dead part of the virus and introduce it into the person where their body destroys it and creates antibodies.
mRNA changes your DNA so that your body reacts a certain way when it comes in contact with the virus, or that is how it is on paper.
From my understanding and what a lot of people don't know is that during prove out trials (you cant do these on humans) they used ferrites because they have a very similar immune system to humans.
In the prove out trials (prove out meaning they give them the vaccine and then introduce them to the virus) the ferrites at i believe a rate of 85% died.
I am not sure if this was the pfizer trials or not, need to go back and look.
I know Australia blocked their trials because it was giving people what appears to be false HIV positives.
Other countries have reported side effects as serious as bells palsey and women being unable to conceive.
You can look all this up which i suggest you do.
I would take ENZC before pfizer any day of the week.
Changing DNA has serious ethical issues such as "are you still human" and "do you still have autonomy or are you a piece of hardware from the company?".
The last seems far fetched but monsanto has seeds that are patented because they changed their DNA structure therefore the seed is no longer "natural".
The same argument could be used on a human if you ask me.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
