Replies to post #313945 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[sts66]

You're suggesting AMRN could be cut off from certain things in discovery if they filed for a prelim injunction? It's not legal for Hikma to deny documents AMRN asks for if they can show relevance to the court AFAIK.

[Number sleven]

B, I think you are right. My discussion with Irish was about wether they would request relief, not a timing issue. My point was simply that we can't allow the generic companies to sell gv for the full duration of the case. Would you not agree? If I remember correctly you are a lawyer. I defer to your opinion about timing and strategy.
Sleven,

[eightisenough]

bouf-courts will NOT grant injunction AFTER discovery. you must show at onset of suit the irreparable damages, if you wait you are conceding damages can be resolved with money damages after trial.

the reason amrn did not ask for preliminary injunction was smart: judges seldom grant them. don't want to lose the motion for preliminary inj. b/c also shows unlikely to succeed in suit (one of pre-injun, condition), judge Andres wrote against granting such injunctions, must post bond, AND NO NEED TO, SINCE TEVA CASE HIKMA
WILL SLOW DOWN THEIR LAUNCH ANYWAY.

8