If they are unblinded they simply cannot have a negotiation with warrant holders. There is too much risk involved there.
If they are in possession of material information while negotiating one side of a contract and not disclosing that information you're asking for problems.
I don’t think they’d tell them anything. So to me the question is whether or not there are any sweeteners apart from simply exchanging extension in consideration for suspension. If there are sweetners, I’d say management was not unblinded at the time. If no sweeteners, then I’d say they were blinded and counter intuitively, this should increase pps once terms are clear.