InvestorsHub Logo

jimmy667

12/06/20 6:57 AM

#336307 RE: CaptainObvious #336306

I am thinking it might be because many of the warrant holders fit the definition of insiders and they would be possibly then making trades by receiving extra warrants with inside information.

VikingInvest

12/06/20 11:11 AM

#336349 RE: CaptainObvious #336306

Because they would sit on knowledge about the trial that the warrant holders who are not insiders would not have.

greenJack

12/06/20 12:47 PM

#336361 RE: CaptainObvious #336306

If they start issuing extra warrants to extend the deadline on the existing, it could be regarded as inside information to these warrant holders. As the company is unblinded already, they move money from existing shareholders (by dilution) to existing warrant holders (issuing extra warrants). Wouldn’t this be highly questionable?