InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

domain311

01/04/07 8:00 PM

#235701 RE: Hockmir #235699

Makes sense to me...
icon url

cm3i long termer

01/04/07 8:39 PM

#235716 RE: Hockmir #235699

Hockmir,

You have always posted as a level minded and knowledgable individual.

At the OSC hearings Monday, what are we to expect?

I mean, will there be a written statement put out to the public that we can attain at the end of the day?

Is there website for these postings?

or are we looking at waiting for days for their hearing decisions?

I am seeking for knoeledge in these proceedings, that I know little about.

Thanks in advance, and God bless you
icon url

waltczyk

01/04/07 8:43 PM

#235718 RE: Hockmir #235699

i agree but surely sljb can clarify on monday at least the simple accusations

was the auditor pr false and misleading - it is really a yes or no answer - and if it is no - show the court why

the me deal - again a yes or no answer - granted this one maybe a bit more complicated but showing proof any proof that they have and had deals in the ME will go along way imo

as for the trading - that is a different matter and will take several hearings due to various people being involved

i am hoping and yes it is a stretch that the court will start to separate the insider trading from the future operations of the company because if the courts in canada say it should be halted than why would a usa court say that it shouldn't be?
icon url

bob41

01/04/07 11:55 PM

#235835 RE: Hockmir #235699

The continual shift of focus, away from the culprits, while intriguing, is wrongheaded.

The observation that that the process may take a long time is most likely correct.

The beginning of the end.