InvestorsHub Logo

rjack18

11/25/20 11:09 AM

#45051 RE: N00B90 #45049

No need to read it again. Not sure what you're doing, thought you were straight up.

Kuzami

11/25/20 11:12 AM

#45053 RE: N00B90 #45049

You should probably take your own advice and read the court case. If you actually did, you would realize that the motion for appointment that was vacated on 07/13/2020 that you're referring to is because it was actually held early on the 7th and approved. Read the minutes and stop trying to spread misinformation...

07/07/2020 Minute Order (7:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Denton, Mark R.)
Re: Petitioner s Motion for Appointment of Custodian


Minutes
07/07/2020 7:00 AM
- Cause appearing, there being no opposition, and pursuant to EDCR 2.20(e) and 2.23(c), the Court GRANTS Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Custodian without oral argument and ORDERS such Motion removed from its civil motion calendar of July 13, 2020. Counsel for moving party to submit a proposed order. IT IS SO ORDERED. CLERK'S NOTE: This Minute Order was electronically served by Courtroom Clerk, Madalyn Kearney, to all registered parties for Odyssey File & Serve. /mk 7/7/20