Replies to post #95798 on Quantum Materials Corp. (fka QTMM)

[QuantumTravesty]

Yup remember when you could buy at $0.10 and sell at $0.06? Definitely a pivot job.

[Kurt_Banoffee]

Hey you forgot this one! Pivot..bingo!

Bingo? More like hypeo!

Like everything else related to the UK program, no mention or even suggestion of anything related to QMC/QDXHID - or even an app.

The marketing consultants continue to spread the false notion that mass surveillance testing is somehow the same thing as health status assurance. They are two very different things with very different requirements.

There is no direct evidence whatsoever that QMC/QDXHID is in any way involved in the testing going on in the UK. None.

One interesting quote from the article:

They joined others including Professor Allyson Pollock of Newcastle University and Professor Jon Deeks of the University of Birmingham in questioning the accuracy of the Innova test.

A study by scientists at Public Health England’s Porton Down labs said that the test was “effective in identifying the cases who are infectious and most likely to transmit the disease”. But Gill and Gray disagree. “The false positive rate of 0.6% means that at the current prevalence in Liverpool, for every person found truly positive, at least one other may be wrongly required to self-isolate,” they wrote. “As prevalence drops, this will become much worse.”

FACTS MATTER

[BigE1960]

Forgot? I suppose if I were in a discussion or debate where someone was claiming that testing was not a tool in the fight against the pandemic then maybe it would be of use. But since no one has expressed that position I am not sure what it brings to the table.

I believe everyone agrees with...

“Mass testing in itself isn’t a panacea – it never will be,” Anderson told the Observer. “But it’s a tool in the armoury.