InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 4496
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/16/2017

Re: trevorbc post# 95798

Sunday, 11/22/2020 4:45:06 PM

Sunday, November 22, 2020 4:45:06 PM

Post# of 104535

Hey you forgot this one! Pivot..bingo!


Bingo? More like hypeo!

Like everything else related to the UK program, no mention or even suggestion of anything related to QMC/QDXHID - or even an app.

The marketing consultants continue to spread the false notion that mass surveillance testing is somehow the same thing as health status assurance. They are two very different things with very different requirements.

There is no direct evidence whatsoever that QMC/QDXHID is in any way involved in the testing going on in the UK. None.

One interesting quote from the article:

They joined others including Professor Allyson Pollock of Newcastle University and Professor Jon Deeks of the University of Birmingham in questioning the accuracy of the Innova test.

A study by scientists at Public Health England’s Porton Down labs said that the test was “effective in identifying the cases who are infectious and most likely to transmit the disease”. But Gill and Gray disagree. “The false positive rate of 0.6% means that at the current prevalence in Liverpool, for every person found truly positive, at least one other may be wrongly required to self-isolate,” they wrote. “As prevalence drops, this will become much worse.”


FACTS MATTER


Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.