In order to claim that someone has committed fraud they would first have to be tried and convicted.
1. Roger Pawson has not even been charged with fraud. 2. If Roger Pawson had been charged with fraud and convicted he would not be allowed to sell stocks "Securities" 3. Stating that someone committed fraud requires proof. 4. Until we see that kind of evidence there is no fraud. 5. Just an opinion is not enough to prove someone committed fraud. 6. Making statements that Roger Pawson committed fraud without a conviction is considered libelous.