Send PM
Followers 46
Posts 4527
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/16/2019

Re: tdbowieknife post# 63857

Thursday, 11/19/2020 8:35:30 AM

Thursday, November 19, 2020 8:35:30 AM

Post# of 89382
In order to claim that someone has committed fraud they would first have to be tried and convicted.

1. Roger Pawson has not even been charged with fraud.
2. If Roger Pawson had been charged with fraud and convicted he would not be allowed to sell stocks "Securities"
3. Stating that someone committed fraud requires proof.
4. Until we see that kind of evidence there is no fraud.
5. Just an opinion is not enough to prove someone committed fraud.
6. Making statements that Roger Pawson committed fraud without a conviction is considered libelous.

Just some fun facts.


“Always give your best, never get discouraged, never be petty; always remember, others may hate you, but those who hate you don't win unless you hate them, and then you destroy yourself.”

Richard Nixon