No one actually knows if PFS was muddled. I actually believe otherwise, but that is neither here nor there. I believe it would have taken too much work and time perhaps if it turned out to be confusing but I think they would have found otherwise, but who needs to go that route when they could focus on the more important gold standard for cancer trials, survival rates.
These guys want you discussing old and useless things instead of discussion what is really going on. They hijack the narrative and create false controversies to confuse any new investors. That is the whole point of these social media strategies perpetrated by shorts and hedge funds. They know retail is easily influenced by fear, and manufacturing narratives and fear is easy. And that crates money for shorts.
It’s a very simple equation. Also, undermining these companies accelerates dilution, which is like a law of gravity for microcaps. And that’s why a certain challenged journalist whom we al know is beloved by shorts. They are literally running money from the pockets of retail and from the treasuries of these companies, directly into their own pockets.
It’s easy to understand what they are doing and why. They can also buy in on success, far more cheaply than if these companies naturally gained in value based upon their actual stories.
The notion that shorts are shareholder advocates is the greatest scam on Wall Street. It’s easy money for “hedge funds” is what it is, and at the expense of retail investors who do not know any better.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
