i respect your dd and verdict, i'm just saying that if we are to believe that a name change did occur on nvsos, then it would have been because a document was filed on their SOS in order to change it, which is the document that is in dispute now.
so if we are saying that the document is fraudulent and fake, then that means that the name change is fake as well, so at the moment, zoomout inc cannot be considered the name of this entity...since the document is fake.
right?