Replies to post #281395 on Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[sage4]

I'm glad to see that FDA is not influenced by the BP for today’s FDA 8-1 (2 uncertain) rejection of Aducanumab. I'd be so upset if it were approved.

Thank you for lobbying the FDA for Anavex and human's sake.

GO AVXL$$

[Talon38]

Bio....maybe we will now get a call from Paul Aisen about looking into the ACTC.

----

https://www.biospace.com/article/releases/cognition-therapeutics-receives-75-8-million-nia-grant-for-540-patient-phase-2-study-of-ct1812-in-collaboration-with-the-alzheimer-s-clinical-trials-consortium-/

[nidan7500]

Bistockclub

Personally, I was appalled that they took this giant, public, step on behalf of an unproven and dangerous drug candidate. This is not opinion given the 8-1 margin citing failure to show efficacy.

Thanks for an exceptionally powerful message. You emphasize (my read) that the processes being used are flawed and ineffective. I totally agree. The results from the past xx years in AD trials and effective research are very clear. No one (except for AVXL) is even close to presenting real biomed based solutions.

AVXL took a big hit on Friday, which IMO was not justified but it was consistent with the last 40+ years in AD-CNS disease solution development. Close but no cigar. We should recover quickly (IMO) if the science is real as many here think it is, including me.

If our science is the real thing, then, we will be fine. Would like to think that the BIIB (obvious scammers) have something tattooed on their foreheads.

Keep em' flying.

[bas2020]

Great work, Bio! Some of us have also pleaded to AA to understand and support the developments of Anavex.

[Fireman02360]

Bio. I want your take on the PPD results. Primary's not met as some other knowledgeable posters are saying? Personally, I dont want to jump to any conclusions until the whole data set is released. Just wanted your thoughts on what was presented. TIA

-Fireman