Thanks for an exceptionally powerful message. You emphasize (my read) that the processes being used are flawed and ineffective. I totally agree. The results from the past xx years in AD trials and effective research are very clear. No one (except for AVXL) is even close to presenting real biomed based solutions.
AVXL took a big hit on Friday, which IMO was not justified but it was consistent with the last 40+ years in AD-CNS disease solution development. Close but no cigar. We should recover quickly (IMO) if the science is real as many here think it is, including me.
If our science is the real thing, then, we will be fine. Would like to think that the BIIB (obvious scammers) have something tattooed on their foreheads.
Bio. I want your take on the PPD results. Primary's not met as some other knowledgeable posters are saying? Personally, I dont want to jump to any conclusions until the whole data set is released. Just wanted your thoughts on what was presented. TIA