InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Number sleven

11/05/20 9:16 AM

#308194 RE: yudilks #308139

HK, That would appear to be the case. I assume they don't think SCOTUS will take our case.
Sleven,
icon url

circuitcity

11/05/20 9:55 AM

#308209 RE: yudilks #308139

They launched but being cautious, mentioned limited qty, which is because of gsk case I believe.

Also in last cc, hikma said they were trying to stock up the inventory before the launch, seems they slowed down a bit and suppose they are watching gsk case, not amrn marine case (it is dead permanently, I think, nobody bother to read singer’s super complicated cyclochampanee argument).

Wondering if this Florida supplier got epa from that Chinese vender? Otherwise, all of sudden, there are two companies can do fda quality epa, which is odd per JT previous comments on supply.
icon url

HinduKush

11/05/20 4:14 PM

#308358 RE: yudilks #308139

GOOD, so this clears up things nicely--let the games begin--Brother Siggi Olaffson wants a fight--will JT take it to him?:
(1) Amarin will wait and then launch their acredited generic version (would be nice if they offered it alone and in combination with a generic statin (ideally atorvastatin) also
(2) Lets see where and when the generic abuse starts up and where the prescribers and the insurance third party payors start fueling the abuse with mandated substitutions without regard to indication. Then the law suits will erupt.I am told presently the HIKMA generic is priced 8.9% below Vascepa pricing but DOES NOT require prior authorization as a generic...(confirmation by real world experience pending)
Our politico CAFC judges clearly want to look the other way while looting is taking place in the name of great generic pricing, H-W philosophy etc., but TEVA vs. GSK has thrown a spanner in the generic war machine, and it will take some time and doing for them to spit it out. I think SCOTUS could very well duck considering Amarin's prima vs. secondary argument considerations, BUT will eventually be forced by the appeals stacking up from various directions, eventually to grant a writ of certiorari, and consider a skinny label arbitration of infringement begins and ends,i.e. a laying down of boundaries for infringement and policing thereof. Meanwhile back at camp nihilism, the CAFC seems happy to drift as always making it up as they go along until they are forced to do otherwise. God help us!
Amen
HK