InvestorsHub Logo

austin01

10/27/20 1:11 PM

#637345 RE: lodas #637342

lodas, considering the potential ramifications of the releases not being signed, what has been distributed so far is NOT "Fair and Reasonable". Agree?

Maximunae69

10/27/20 1:20 PM

#637346 RE: lodas #637342

100% correct,

continuity

10/27/20 1:37 PM

#637348 RE: lodas #637342

You make a good point; but you are missing a couple points.

At the time of the acceptance of POR 7, there was at least one group and possibly several that stopped attacking and accepted the new agreement. The picture I had in my head was they were in shock at the amounts they saw. Today, we still have groups desperate to get into the agreement -- even postponing immediate payment.

I believe these point to monstrous potential recoveries.

nosch

10/27/20 1:47 PM

#637350 RE: lodas #637342

lodas,
I think the judge could only rule within her jurisdiction and that was WMI and WMIIC, two CH 11 cases and no beyond. She had no judicial access to the other assets or involvements. This is why we have been talking about safe harbor assets for a long time. User Andy recently wrote very interesting about it. All best!