Replies to post #278060 on Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[powerwalker]

nidan, thanks for the post as it reminds me to ask the board of the significance of "n = 132." At some point, it was noted that with Australian sites added (2, per clinical.gov), the "n" w/b 150 or more.

How should we interpret the lower number? Deaths of participants seems the most likely reason (How many from CV-19, on placebo or on treatment). Given the PR, it doesn't seem to have an impact on the interpretation of the results.

TIA


ANAVEX NOW ... RIGHT NOW ... MONO-STYLE ... for LIFE ... and for ALL AGES!!!