Replies to post #277588 on Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[Lima4918]

And Missling is notorious for not saying much.

So last week he announces a PR with a conference call with a world renowned PDD expert, Dr. Aarsland, where he proclaims "statistically significant" and "clinically meaningful" PDD results.


For a guy who almost never communicates with shareholders what the heck happened last week?


I think Missling communicated most excellent results in PDD and he is 100% sure. Otherwise, he would have kept his mouth shut as usual.

[Falkinator7]

Furthermore, it is not just Missling who is making claims that put his reputation on the line.

It is also Dr. Jaime Kulisevsky Bojarski, MD, PhD, Full Professor of Neurology & Vice-Dean Faculty of Medicine Autonomous University of Barcelona and Director of the Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Neurology, Sant Pau Hospital and Principal Investigator in the trial who said "As the first double-blind trial of ANAVEX®2-73 (blarcamesine) in PDD, this proof-of-concept study provides extremely encouraging data".

It is also Dag Aarsland, MD, PhD, Professor and the Head of Department of Old Age Psychiatry at the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, UK who said “I am very pleased to see the promising results of the ANAVEX®2-73-PDD-001 trial, providing significant improvements in cognitive function accompanied by a favorable safety and tolerability profile.”

So at least 3 people are putting their reputation on the line here.

[imho]

Anders2211,

What would Missling gain in buying a few months until the publication reveals he flat out lied?

It is not about lying. Missling has an opinion. If that opinion is not shared by the scientific community, he is not a liar. But the results will speak for themselves. Numbers do not lie, but they can be misinterpreted and misunderstood.

I am very bullish that this time is different and that the results will back up the unbelievably positive PR. But there is the small chance we will be disappointed.

IMHO