InvestorsHub Logo

Level2Me

10/16/20 7:57 PM

#305735 RE: Level2Me #305734

Spot on!

While the need for en banc action is great, the task for the Court is minimal. This is not a controversial situation—the Court need not create new law. Everyone agrees that objective evidence must be considered before reaching a final legal conclusion on obviousness. Thus, the Court need only endorse a framework and clarify its application.

lizzy241

10/17/20 11:19 AM

#305769 RE: Level2Me #305734

level, does it matter that the first amicus mentions Amarin and in second filing it's deleted??