InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Monk44

10/08/20 7:07 PM

#303958 RE: sstyles #303956

sstyles

There you go making sense again. Love it.
icon url

Number sleven

10/08/20 7:11 PM

#303959 RE: sstyles #303956

sstyles, Thank you for elaborating on what I glossed over. Do you know if Teva is pursuing further legal action? I assume they will. I think you are spot on in your analysis. The risk for generic companies to launch at scale is high. They could be risking bankruptcy over sales of one drug. I didn't think they will do it either. I hope you and I are right.
Sleven,
icon url

postes

10/08/20 7:44 PM

#303965 RE: sstyles #303956

Styles..I think your right...WS should have a PR from AMRN...only silenxet
icon url

Biobillionair

10/08/20 7:48 PM

#303966 RE: sstyles #303956

Lost profits damages could be large enough to have a material impact on the business viability of either Hikma or Dr. Reddy’s.



Legal advice to Hikma from an attorney.

https://www.markmanadvisors.com/blog/2020/10/7/can-amarin-benefit-from-the-gsk-v-teva-decision-regarding-induced-infringement-for-off-label-sales
icon url

golden flyer

10/08/20 8:02 PM

#303970 RE: sstyles #303956

its ironic--thero had absolutely nothing to do with this new impetus to stock price,
icon url

circuitcity

10/08/20 9:35 PM

#303982 RE: sstyles #303956

Very encouraging analysis, and I agree with most of it. Couple thoughts I have are: 1) think Hikma will still launch but not at high volume, they can launch as a min amount just to keep their 6 mos exclusivity; 2) I am less optimistic than you on teva case to be held;!at least their chance getting en banco is better than amrn imo. And I believe that is how street is seeing us. If street share your view, amrn now should be traded at a prior to 3/31 level or even more.

I hope you are right and hope JT will take good advantage of this opportunity and make a reasonable deal.