Replies to post #303800 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[rafunrafun]

Marjac - well done. Two questions:

1) The documents appear to be scans and not OCRs (not searchable). Could that be an issue? All previous docs filed in this case were OCR.

2) Why didn't you include Bhatt's paper?

Thank you.

[Euged]

Thanks Marjac for all the work you put in.

[Gbert]

Thanks Marjac, BB, and others involved in this mission. I’m a proud supporter of your efforts.

[money_man]

Thank you Marjac et al.

[Freifaller]

Link please - thanks.

[Jasbg]

That is just great. How much weight did Marjac and BB loose during this.

Hopefully they are in good shape and spirit still :)

Thanks to everyone involved in the Amicus project - Marjac especially.

[lizzy241]

marjac, BB
Bravo, you're my HEROS! Thank you.

[anfla]

The one big thing missing from the Amicus is a clear nexus to the improper weighing of the objective indices, which would have paired nicely with Singer’s brief. Kurbayashi was improperly presented with a cropped table and testimony from Heineken that led Du to wrongly accept the prima facie case as being strongly in favor of obviousness. However, the objective indicia and secondary considerations exist to protect against exactly that - an import per or erroneous assessment of the prima facie. The unexpected results and commercial success should have been a clue for Du that maybe she was understanding something incorrectly - for example, the historical studies did not truly prove what she thought they did. So objective indicia should have saved her. But she discounted it using improper methods of analysis.