We will not get anywhere attacking a trial judge's evaluation of expert witness credibility. Rather, the attack focuses on the generics committing a fraud on the court which caused her to be misguided in her findings. At minimum, the case should be reversed and remanded for a re-evaluation of obviousness in the wake of the generics' misconduct, and the conclusion in the Bhatt article.
* Would it be wise to include within your Amicus “how judge Du took it upon herself to extrapolate her own interpretation of the expert testimony that did not conform to scientific fact “ .and could not have been foreseen by Amarin counsel to correct such misguidings?*
... not to mention that her opinion was fostered after she was ‘educated’ by someone somewhere somehow sometime b4 rendering her (assuming not her clerk) judgement. LOL.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
