Replies to post #62979 on Seafarer Exploration Corp (SFRX)

[Tigerdave]

This is so true...

You are never going to convince someone of something when they don't want to be convinced of it. They weren't reasoned into their opinions so they can't be reasoned out of it.

[Raider21]

Quote:You are never going to convince someone of something when they don't want to be convinced of it. They weren't reasoned into their opinions so they can't be reasoned out of it.

Notice the attempt to argue two opposing ideas: First, that the SeaSearcher technology already exists and Two, that it can't possible exist because it would defy physics.

And then the very uninformed argument that the SeaSearcher is merely a "software modification" to existing technology even though photos of totally new hardware were already available for public viewing.

At least they are no longer trying to say the SeaSearcher doesn't physically exist at all which was where they started.

Also unable to discern that weather changes from one day to the next and not going out one day with 15 foot waves does not mean they can't go out a week later with much lower waves.

And don't forget the many instances of Gish Gallop.

These logical fallacies will continue for reasons that have already been exposed.
____________________________________________________

Actually none of what you've said is really reverent. Bottom line is it obviously doesn't work and its found nothing.

Smart people would have performed simulated tests in an actual already found 1715 or 1733 shipwreck site with pre-buried non-ferrous metals. The shipwreck being important as it presents all the normal ferro-magnetic contaminates. Also prepare to move and do their surveys in research determined areas where the 'Concepcion' and treasure are. Not where it isn't. Apparently these aren't very smart people.

[hedge_fun]

Please provide a white paper on Tinkerbell 2.0.......

It should be linked along with SFRX's claims about Tinkerbell 2.0 on the website.

You are never going to convince someone of something when they don't want to be convinced of it. They weren't reasoned into their opinions so they can't be reasoned out of it.

This is what Tiger posted from SFRX's claims on their website. A novice might be blown away by the claim, but it's beyond laughable. And how many months has it been on the website?

The SeaSearcher system extends capabilities well beyond what is available today in the area of sub-bottom imaging. While sub-bottom imaging has existed for years to identify course strata and general layer density, the technology to perform high-resolution 3D imaging below the sea-bottom in real-time on an autonomous vehicle has not.

You do understand how higher resolution is obtained, don't you?

If they can produce a higher resolution 3D image on an autonomous vehicle, then let's see it?

Tell us, how exactly were you "reasoned" into believing their claims about Tinkerbell 2.0?

And then the very uninformed argument that the SeaSearcher is merely a "software modification" to existing technology even though photos of totally new hardware were already available for public viewing.

Tinkerbell 2.0 is a platform they probably bought from a college science project. As they admit this is not new technology. They claim their software is proprietary, but at this point it ain't nothing to brag about. That's the modification. They don't even admit the sensors are proprietary.

You have been the one suggesting they built it all from scratch, which is absurd.

But have at it. Tell us how "reason" took over your believe about the device.

TIA

[trueblue]

You will only end up with a red mark on your forehead, debating with some about what sfrx can do. I really feel that even when they find treasure, some will still have excuses as to why they don't think the equipment works. I hang onto my shares. JMO