Replies to post #64189 on RedHawk Holdings Corp (fka SNDD)

[Buttercup5]

https://dockets.justia.com/docket/new-york/nysdce/1:2018cv11897/506867. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8355962/auctus-fund-llc-v-redhawk-holdings-corp/. Jelly- What happened here? Do they still own all the TOXIC DEBT? Why wasn't Ema and Auctus filed? Why were they both excluded from not only 8k's but from any specific mention in the 10q's and K's? Why would such a massive dilution event not be disclosed? Why did the company get sued from both of them in the first place? What was the core of the lawsuit? Where was the settlement specifically disclosed? You as a shareholder don't care- really? We do and many shareholders do as well. This onion will get peeled back whether you or any other shareholders care or not. Too important- this is a public company. Transparency

[Buttercup5]

WHEN ALL PREFERREDS ARE CONVERTED THERE ARE OVER 1.5 BILLION SHARES OUTSTANDING - THIS NUMBER IS BEFORE ALL THE TOXIC DEBT CONVERTS - WE ARE VERY CLOSE TO 2 BILLION SHARES FULLY DILUTED - WOW. 2 BILLION Preferred stock, 5,000 authorized shares and 3,750 and 4,000 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2020 and June 30, 2019, respectively
5% Series A, 2,750 shares designated, $1,123 and $1,099 stated value, respectively, 2,750 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2020 and June 30, 2019 3,087,691 3,021,453
5% Series B, 1,250 shares designated, $1,228 and $1,183 stated value, respectively, and 1,000 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2020 and 1,250 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2019 1,227,964 1,479,039
Common Stock, par value of $0.001 per share, 2,000,000,000 authorized shares and 1,171,208,112 and 1,034,340,037 issued, respectively