Replies to post #1580 on Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd (NCLH)

[deet49]

Helms-Burton Plaintiffs Have Article III Standing Courts HOLD
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=33146390-7710-4164-9f5e-67db7c2ce662 CCL RCL NCLH

The Bottom Line: Under the court's order, an allegation of profiting from the use of property that was confiscated by the Cuban government is a sufficiently concrete harm for purposes of Article III standing. The court's order also establishes that a court may not dismiss or strike trafficking allegations that are, by themselves, time-barred where the plaintiff alleges a longstanding course of conduct, including non-timebarred trafficking, in support of its claim.

FRAZzel Dazzel

[deet49]

HAVANA DOCKS CORPORATION V. NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE HOLDINGS, LTD. [1:19-cv-23591; Southern Florida District] NCLH
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/29762906/Havana_Docks_Corporation_v_Norwegian_Cruise_Line_Holdings,_Ltd

Colson Hicks Eidson, P.A. (plaintiff)
Margol & Margol, P.A. (plaintiff)
Hogan Lovells US LLP (defendant)

[LINK] To Mediator Statement (20 February 2021)

#30 Havana Docks Corporation $9,179,701
Top 50 Certified U.S. Corporate Claims [LINK]

CCL RCL