InvestorsHub Logo

Suvorov

09/04/20 11:21 AM

#36625 RE: ACRL_AuEgg #36624

Good luck with that.

Jack_Herer

09/04/20 12:53 PM

#36626 RE: ACRL_AuEgg #36624

ACRL's claims are NOT "next door" to Macassa. "Next door" implies on the same side of the street, adjacent to, possibly on strike with...
ACRL's claims are in fact across the street (south of the fault), an entirely different neighbourhood altogether, and a not-so-nice one riddled with muggers and junkies and abandoned houses with all the windows broken.
Not even a Tims or a McDonalds on the south side of Main Street...

ACRL_AuEgg

09/05/20 6:57 AM

#36627 RE: ACRL_AuEgg #36624

Like Eric Sprott and Doug Casey say: team and location is what really counts to warrant their investment. I second to them hands down, hence I'm investing with ACRL that has second to none geotech team with a location that's hard to beat: Ontario, Canada, mere 2-3km from a world class high grade gold mine of Macassa mine (Kirkland Gold Corp)!

KLG at Macassa mine in April of 2020 confirmed deep drilling towards ACRL and guess what, there were deep drilling with strikes resulting in 4-5 oz/ton. Yep, buying low and selling high!

Drilling through east portion of Main Break at Macassa intersects high-grade mineralization in close proximity to #4 Shaft (currently under development) and planned exploration drift off 5700 Level (intersection located 50 m east of previous drilling and 300 m below deepest level at Kirkland Minerals)
-- Key intercept: 141.3 gpt over 2.4 m core length (Main Break Corridor)1


https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2020/04/22/2020089/0/en/Kirkland-Lake-Gold-Identifies-New-Large-Corridor-of-High-Grade-Mineralization-Along-Main-Break-East-of-Macassa-Mine.html

Remember ACRL's Todora claims of 2-8 oz/ton? I do ;)