InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Meowza

09/03/20 11:53 AM

#295646 RE: io_io #295638

Yeah they are thick as thieves, and never dissent among each other *eyeroll*
icon url

shadolane

09/03/20 12:07 PM

#295661 RE: io_io #295638

Your comments assume that the judges ead the board. Except for the action taken directly toward Du.

In any case if those were a part of tge decision then it was retribution not objectiveness.

The system failed.
icon url

urbandk24

09/03/20 1:01 PM

#295719 RE: io_io #295638

Right you are brother!
icon url

rafunrafun

09/03/20 1:14 PM

#295727 RE: io_io #295638

After all, recalling the cult of attacks and intimidations directed by posters at Judge Du, some of these couched as 'legal actions', widely and crudely supported on the board, what really could you expect from ........................ other judges?


Really? Let's test out your 'logic':

1) Company X sues Company Y.

2) Shareholders of Y pretend to be shareholders of X and form a "cult of attacks and intimidations directed by posters at the trial Judge, some of these couched as 'legal actions'", again, masquerading as shareholders of X.

3) Using your 'logic', trial Judge rules in favor of Company Y because of the above!


Brilliant, why didn't millions of litigants and shareholders think of this 'strategy'?

Obvious sarcasm.