InvestorsHub Logo

Freifaller

09/03/20 11:02 AM

#295588 RE: marjac #295576

Sorry what is that for a bullshit system in the US (I´m from europe) where you can judge about something without telling why...

rafunrafun

09/03/20 12:12 PM

#295666 RE: marjac #295576

M - things don't add up. I spoke to / read / listened to at least 20 opinions of lawyers (you included). All gave Amarin 40-70% chance of winning. Not a single one thought that rule 36 was even remotely possible, given the strength of Amarin's arguments.

As every attorney thought it was a coin toss at worse, how the heck does the court conclude that Amarin's arguments do not have merit?

And why such cowardness by CAFC, they disagree with Amarin, fine, but why not say WHY they disagree?

This reminds me of having a political debate, I make a logical point and the other side says: wrong, you're a racist... and ends the debate.

WTF was that?!

Chemist2

09/03/20 12:35 PM

#295696 RE: marjac #295576

Hi Marjac; Does that qualify as a paragraph? ;.)

shadolane

09/03/20 12:38 PM

#295700 RE: marjac #295576

Where do AMRN shareholders protest?

Danburydude

09/03/20 12:44 PM

#295704 RE: marjac #295576

The judges on those afternoon half hour legal shows put more thought into an auto accident case that the three old , lazy ass judges put into this case . These three judges just showed up to collect their paycheck for the day .

Number sleven

09/03/20 12:47 PM

#295707 RE: marjac #295576

Marjac,Do you see any point for Amarin to continue on with the legal process?
Sleven,