I'm going to stop posting here and just read your Posts from now on!
You have my Vote!
My thought/conclusion this afternoon sides with your Position.
Anything short of a Remand will open the door for either side to Appeal and that is what Appeals Judges (or any Judge for that matter) want to avoid at any cost!
Dyke just had a decision of his overturned this past Monday by his own Team!
No questions by the other (2) is very unusual yet so is a Remand - they go hand-in-hand (which is hopefully their plan and hopefully why they were silent!)
I defer to all of you that are well versed in the law, but my question is it normal for the appeals court to remand and instruct the the district judge (as you did in 1-4) how to do her job?
If I’ve learned anything from this nightmare it’s that these decisions are such squishy, subjective bullshit that Du will easily find a way to rule against AMRN. Her agenda demands it.