Replies to post #194259 on OWC Pharmaceutical Research Corp (OWCP)

[Johnny risk]

True

[I-Glow]

I believe that Turner has changed the voting so that the reverse split is guaranteed - so I don't think it matters how retail shareholders vote.

But I would never vote for a reverse split.

Some guy wanted to argue with me that a abstaining from voting was a yes vote and quoted from Robert's Rules of Order which has nothing to do with securities. Abstaining is the same as a No vote.

Here is the problem - Turner hasn't been motivated to get the proxy material out and Turner hasn't tried to convince shareholders the need for a reverse split. That makes me very suspicious because of the new clause about the Series A and B shareholders.

But we will soon find out.

Plus, DGF can file a Motion for Summary Judgment against OWCP. That would just as disastrous.

IG