Not if the lawyers are refusing to allow them to post things that are not yet finalized. For example, we got the recent PR about a cement deal. Since then, the lawyers have not allowed the company to say anything. According to Airys, Petar and Steve are FLAMING MAD about this. It is conceivable that the lawyers are not allowing them to say anything about any deals that are not completely finalized. This does not mean that they can't show verifiable evidence to whoever wants to see it about past PR's. Petar and Steve wanted to post PR's about these things, but they said the lawyers will not allow it. Again, they were flaming mad that the lawyers would not allow these PR's to be published. Two large investors showed concern for this so they simply said, "Come on up and we'll show you what we can." Also, they're not going to post on their site that they HAD pwc as their auditing firm or that they HAD a cement deal and lost it. "Look, we did have it.. See?" That's not very professional to put on your webpage, especially when the world does not revolve around I-Hub and there are others accessing the page than ourselves.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
