Replies to post #62069 on RedHawk Holdings Corp (fka SNDD)

[Divest]

Let's look at the evidence and then you can tell me. The Actus Fund sued Redhawk as toxic noteholders do,for shares and money. Redhawk, but then dropped their lawsuit in, exchange for $55,000 and 55 million shares both of which were fully paid and converted last year. The demanded shares and funds are listed below:



It is obvious that this situation was fully resolved last year. Now using Pacer we can get up to date information on this case updated seconds ago today, and what do we see?



The case was settled in June 2019, and the attempt by the lender was able to reopen it breifly, it was dismissed with prejudice, meaning no appeals are allowed. This is not a pressing concern for current investors.

[Diamond_Dog]

A dismissal with prejudice is dismissal of a case
on merits after adjudication.The plaintiff is
barred from bringing an action on the same claim.
Dismissal with prejudice is a final judgment and
the case becomes res judicata ("a matter decided")
on the claims that were or could have been brought
in it.

The legalese is explained above, like Divest stated
it's a done deal, OVER, KAPUT,
END OF THE ROAD FOR THAT CASE, DROP IT, ETC .

D_DOG