However the citations she listed (7,14) about potential patient selection bias does not say anything about patient selection bias unless I'm missing something or she just pulled 2 citations hoping no one would fact check it.
7. The microenvironmental landscape of brain tumors Daniela F. Quail1 and Johanna A. Joyce2,3,*
And
14 is a press release from Celldex and I don't see anything about patient selection bias.
There was a doctor a few years ago who had run a competing vaccine trial I believe, who alleged this and Dr. Liau put a nail in it. It’s not true, in fact the population is not favorable at all, but there was no selection bias. That guy just pulled junk from his but hole.
Now this author has stumbled on the old comment and revived it by not actually looking further. Typical crap to happen just before news. This is the stuff that happens all the time, and you’re never sure how it took back to live in zombie form.
Her keyword there is “potential” bias. I think she likely already knows it was discredited IMHO or did not bother to review the further discussions, and just threw that in there for her own protection given that there has been criticism. That’s behind covering language. She’s just noting criticism.
People know there are critics so they probably nod to them regardless of the credibility of the critique. It’s not uncommon for non-expert journalists.
By the way, this is to my best recollection, I will let one of the other resident posters who drilled down at the time confirm it. My memory is what it is... but I don’t have all the details.