InvestorsHub Logo

JoTu

07/30/20 8:07 AM

#195896 RE: Gamesc #195895

of all the possible ‘inner portion’ materials suggested for ‘enhanced thermal conductivity’ bmg would be best suited for that.

PayMEmf

07/30/20 8:08 AM

#195897 RE: Gamesc #195895

I always enjoy reading these, makes me a believer....thanks games!

usaskull

07/30/20 8:44 AM

#195898 RE: Gamesc #195895

Thanks Games.
Most relevant poster here.

How many patents is LQMT/CIP at now in their portfolio?

Almosthere

07/30/20 10:29 AM

#195905 RE: Gamesc #195895

Thanks for the links games.

This information is very informative and underscores where Apple is headed with BMG.

This is why Lugee Li got into the game BIG TIME (personal ownership of 410 million shares, and shared IP with Eontec)

There is no way in hell Li won’t have revenue flowing to Liquidmetal LF to make himself rich.

Me thinks the time is ripe for Apple’s use of BMG after 10 years of R&D!

joshuaeyu

07/30/20 12:16 PM

#195917 RE: Gamesc #195895

This seem to indicate BMG inside with other cosmetic material outside.

Watts Watt

07/30/20 12:46 PM

#195922 RE: Gamesc #195895

The most important thing to regard in this and many more contemporary patent filings of Apple and others is the new reference to BULK METALLIC GLASSES instead of the older previous references to Liquidmetal.

This is a catalclysmic major shift in patent nomenclature.

It certainly portends the new wave of lack of prestige that the once famous Liquidmetal oxymoronic terminology of John Kang enjoyed.

LQMT is more than ever, fading into oblivion.

So much for "getting the name of Liquidmetal" out in the marketplace.

It is, in fact, the continued wave of bad publicity created by failed LQMT management that has ruined the name of Liquidmetal.

Scientists shying away from using this nomenclature says a lot, BIGLY.