InvestorsHub Logo

Restingzebra

07/29/20 7:55 PM

#288666 RE: johnking29 #288662

Thank you for reposting J. And thanks again to H. We miss your brilliant insight H. Hope you are well and will post again sometime soon.

Whalatane

07/29/20 8:10 PM

#288668 RE: johnking29 #288662

Interesting analysis . One problem I have is that AMRN / Covington should have found the problem with Mori ( some data NS and the significance of that ) long before this went to trial .
Dr Bhatt et al found it post trial decision ....
AMRN and Covington made some really dumb mistakes here ...as poster Ziploc presented earlier
Kiwi

ziploc_1

07/29/20 8:42 PM

#288676 RE: johnking29 #288662

"The Court thus finds that the satisfaction of long-felt need and commercial success secondary considerations weigh in Plaintiffs’ favor, and the remaining secondary considerations weigh in Defendants’ favor. More specifically, the Court finds that Vascepa is a commercial success even though it has not yet turned a profit, and that there was long felt need for a single pill that reduced TG levels without increasing LDL-C levels."

However Judge Du follows this up with the vague statement that other S.C., proffered by the plaintiffs, weaken the positive S.C., which she has just described...she cites no precedent for this approach of weighing negative S.C. against what she has just mentioned were quite positive S.C.

This approach is so subjective as to render all present and future evaluations of S.C. meaningless.

lizzy241

07/30/20 4:33 PM

#288812 RE: johnking29 #288662

Johnking, thanks for posting HAMOA's positive refresher course. Holy Cow, I need some encouragement at this juncture.