InvestorsHub Logo

J-RO

12/20/06 9:03 PM

#74348 RE: 06mets #74347

Mets: Glad to have you aboard....That post about Blech relation to Becker makes a lot of sense. Appreciate your insight....Isnt IUHB way better than RB?

pickleking

12/20/06 9:05 PM

#74349 RE: 06mets #74347

And he is the Scum bag that is no longer financing Xkem. . . right?

makingalivingmdtx

12/20/06 9:05 PM

#74350 RE: 06mets #74347

Thank you for the explaination. Now with the changes what do you think will happen in the next week? Month? 6 months in PPS based on upcoming news and revenues. I value your opinion.

J-RO

12/20/06 9:07 PM

#74351 RE: 06mets #74347

Thanks for that piece of DD METS!!!

BB_Blue Chip

12/20/06 9:09 PM

#74352 RE: 06mets #74347

Mets, that has got to be one of the best explanations to date as to why the share price is where it is. Thank you for explaining it in depth, glad to have you on board, XKEM is finally going to be priced at fair market value!

BB

IMO

rockommundo

12/20/06 9:25 PM

#74355 RE: 06mets #74347

hi 06mets mets fan from jersey here.. i was just wondering if the money from chassmen was a nessesary loan for exem so they could be in the position they are today, were u have no credit so u take any possible deal to get funding that u can? . just a question, thanks wl

Goldrush2001

12/20/06 9:25 PM

#74356 RE: 06mets #74347

mets, Thank you. It all makes sense with the way this stock has been trading.

winwarz

12/20/06 9:35 PM

#74358 RE: 06mets #74347

The last time i heard so much bull****,Clinton was President

Your knowledge of the last 5-7 years appears to be very limited.



http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/919611/000101270902000488/0001012709-02-000488.txt
(see page f-17)

If not for Blech & Co. in 1999 Dr. Pandey would have nothing!
not even a voting share in XKEM.,,
there would be NO Xechem....NONE !

do more homework and less speculation !

XKEM is always "perfectly priced"
and 'the MM is your friend"

the pps is where it is because of 'Revenues'! = $81,000.

your b.s. will probably be well received amongst the sheep.




winwarz


backdoorbear

12/20/06 9:53 PM

#74361 RE: 06mets #74347

06mets: Thank you for your analysis, which makes more sense than anything else I have heard to date.

I would be very interested in your opinion/thoughts regarding how the current number of authorized shares will impact pps over the next year.

BDB

thelimeyone

12/20/06 10:00 PM

#74366 RE: 06mets #74347

Glad to see that the obvious "manipulation" of the share price was not due to Naked Shorting, assuming its true but sounds feasible. perhaps someone with an ear to the Co can corroborate the Becker duplicity? Then can we get this show on the road, please. tlo.

gwikley

12/20/06 11:01 PM

#74381 RE: 06mets #74347

Thank you for that knowledgeable and honest post. I hold this stock but have stopped paying any attention to it. Long ago, when I first bought I did so with the full knowledge that Blech had just, virtually, come off his probation and after reading the Seattle Times articles on his rape of so many companies....I paid particular attention to his candid statement that he "wished he had another opportunity to rectify the damage done". A repentant.

Then the angel funding began with XKEM, and behind it.....Mr. Blech. I quit watching the stock after that, knowing full well that with such an incredible amount of cheap shares it would take awhile before he decided to move on.....if there was any company left. And sure enough with every PR, that got the price up a few points....wham!!! Oh well.

I spoke those sentiments many, many moons ago. And was throughly trashed for bashing the stock. Everyone here at that time paid little attention to the intense involvement that Blech had achieved. So be it. I could never understand how he was allowed to proceed with XKEM. His conviction and sentence documentation was so complete and restrictive...it seemed puzzling how he could get away with such blantant manipulation. BWTHDIK

Thanks again.

redronwal

12/20/06 11:13 PM

#74387 RE: 06mets #74347

06mets

Thanks for the great information.

Are you sure your not a Yankee fan?

After all, Willie is at the helm....

Later

Red

Dspetry

12/20/06 11:18 PM

#74389 RE: 06mets #74347

in addition no matter how good the company looked and how high in demand the drug was no heay hitters were going to go near it because they knew blech WAS pulling the strings and he was entrenched with millions and millions of 144 stock becoming free trading every month theae astute investors knew he would be dumping into every piece of good news

One of the things we asked Burg when we were at the SHM, was about this... They maintained that they really didn;t know how many shares Chassman had (They were always very upfront about calling her Chassman)... I tried to get them to give us a number... Steve at one point just looked at us all, and said millions, and refered us to the filings. he did say though, that they wouldn't be where they are today if it weren't for her.

Thanks for clearing that up.

When the building is up & running in Nigeria, and we are pumping out millions of little pills, this thing FLIES !!!

Dave