no diagrams or tech articulation needed.. . simply utilize 2 modems side by side, 1 with chanbond tech & 1 without (Longterm, don't know if you read, cox's 3 month continuance request re: premise of older jury members not being ideal jurors, my suspicion is a younger demographic would comprehend the tech far better re: "beyond a reasonable doubt" legal standard of proof
ChanBond seeks significant damages and neither side should be advantaged, or disadvantaged, by foreseeable impacts upon the jury’s composition or ability to perform its task, or witnesses’ location, age, or underlying health issues. These factors can have a disproportionate impact on fairness of a trial in the current environment. A continuance can serve to remedy that.
"In addition, because COVID-19 poses heightened risks to people of a certain age, the jury that is available to serve may not be representative of the jury that would traditionally be seated"
Ultimately, the Defendant may believe itself prejudiced by some of these changes, and Plaintiff by others, but nobody will consider the case a good test of how to proceed with the remaining 12 cases. In fact, any appeal from the Cox case may focus on prejudice perceived by the losing party, rather than on the merits. A Continuance Will Not Prejudice Any Party and Will Serve to Avoid Prejudice.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
