Replies to post #57120 on NewStream Energy Technologies Group Inc (NSGP)

[JB61]

i personally see (and again dont trade on this)

the tech being licensed out and so all revenue generated (or a majority) goes to the bottom line.

let's say we charge $2 per ton of coal. Let's say we do 50-100 million coal a year. that's 100-200 million in revenue.

100-200 X a 10 PE ratio is 1-2 billion valuation. thats a conservative 10X.

200-500 million shares at a 1-2 billion dollar valuation is $2 to $10 in price per share.

So why people may complain about issuing convertible debt to the market...i truly don't care as the valuation can easily be 100 to 1. at current prices.

Finally, a reverse split is off the table. Management would have to get shareholder approval for this and i doubt there is any appetite for this from the base.

Long story short: wrap up the plant, test the coal and lets sell some licenses. It's go time.

[Cartman 3_16]

Good post. I enjoyed reading it. But I think it’s a dangerous leap of faith to believe that there’s no risk in commercialization because “in theory” one test plant shows the tech can be commercialized.

Seems to me if that were true, clients would be beating down the door right now. And we certainly wouldn’t be flirting with sub-penny land.

[JamesE_]

Agreed. If the test plant works, scaling up should be simple and straightforward. For the kiln, just double the diameter and quadruple the length. Due to its modular design, there should be little risk involved for the licensee other than the initial capital investment. Even then, they can mitigate that risk by building a single commercial module and running it through its paces.

If CCTI can just demonstrate their upgraded facility and sign one client this year, we will all be sitting pretty. I am confident that WILL happen. I firmly believe once the ice is broken, CCTC will snowball. Not saying we'll see a dollar this year, but 0.10-0.30 is possible, if not likely. Then next year, move the decimal point! $$$