InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

bobshmob

07/17/20 4:40 PM

#95265 RE: ombowstring #95259

Hear, hear! A perfecta for leronlimab, m/m now and in a week or two DSMB intervenes to cut short the s/c trials to give leronlimab to the placebo arm to save lives.
icon url

Saltz

07/17/20 6:56 PM

#95306 RE: ombowstring #95259

That is precisely what we want to see happen. It would seem that the midpoint in enrollment would be the timeline for such a decision. I’m suspecting we are at 150 enrolled and 195 patients would be the half way point.

Can’t imagine being one of the very sick that is on placebo. It’s unconscionable.
icon url

Borel Fields

07/17/20 7:41 PM

#95319 RE: ombowstring #95259

I'm listening to the arguments as to why the m/m or s/c trial is more likely to be statistically significant. But is "significant" all there is to "important?"

I've been seeing another figure of merit: how many patients do you have to treat to save one life? Clearly, that metric favors using the (presumably limited) doses of leronlimab in the s/c setting, where death is otherwise imminent for a substantial fraction of patients, even though a few patients might be unsalvageable.

For the m/m benefit calc, there would need to be some estimate of what fraction of patients "saved" by leronlimab (from progressing to s/c) would have eventually died.