Agree on all points!
I will write to strongly encourage a QUICk approval of the settlement but encourage that the parties not be rewarded for their misrepresentation to the court, and the delays caused entirely by their actions.
In other words, the substantive provisions of the settlement are good, but the Court should very carefully consider whether the Plaintiffs should receive over a million TriWay shares after representing to the Court that there was "no consideration" in connection with the settlement.
Why not distribute those shares to all shareholders, that includes the Plaintiffs and their entities?