pitc said, before they spend $Billions to change-out their systems etc.
WOW, for someone who claims to own hundreds of thousands of shares for 17+years you seem to not understand the SIMPLE FACT that there is NOT ANY SUCH "$Billions" CHANGEOVER COST to implement LWLG's game changing TRUE NEXT-GEN SOLUTIONS!
Our solutions include the following advantages:
Excellent scalability of materials, device, and platform
Versatility and ease of production of plastics (polymers)
Process compatible for integration with Silicon Photonics and InP
Extreme miniaturization
Very high-speed performance with femtosecond response times
Understood thanks for clarifying. I am not an expert in anything. I don't have a binary answer to your question. It is not an either/or situation. I agree with Jeunke in his last post where he said we are in that business decision phase.
This part of the customer engagement process is extremely complex with countless variables and should not be oversimplified. That's the only way I can answer your question because everyone on this message board knows a very very very small fraction of the current variables being faced and overcome in the current process.
That said, I completely disagree with all the recent posts saying that Lebby should be sharing more information publicly. Anything he gives to shareholders, he also gives away to potential customers and competition. Business is much like war.
The answer is that both are a legitimate hurdle for Lightwave to overcome. Also why they should try to bolster the share price or find legitimate investors to support them, instead of having to jump start their ailing retail shareholders like an old car battery every time it hits .60 something cents.