InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

ilovetech

07/05/20 5:06 PM

#284596 RE: rafunrafun #284595

Raf-Bingo!
icon url

marjac

07/05/20 5:19 PM

#284598 RE: rafunrafun #284595

Raf, see my Post #284452 directly addressing that concern as overblown. Patent cases would never settle and companies would never get sold if what you say, was the case.
icon url

mrmainstreet

07/05/20 9:30 PM

#284605 RE: rafunrafun #284595

Raf, we need a new poll that forces one answer. Will the Du ruling be reversed, affirmed, remanded, or will the parties settle? Let's see where people land when they must pick a single outcome, not probabilities.
icon url

Biobillionair

07/05/20 9:43 PM

#284606 RE: rafunrafun #284595

Really? Thanks Raf. And why would Amarin negotiate such idiotic terms? 2028 entry? That would be reckless of Amarin to not offer same time of entry but offer to supply H&R.... JMO. BB
icon url

Ray

07/06/20 8:00 AM

#284631 RE: rafunrafun #284595

I don't see this happening. The way the EPA market will be shaping up by 2029, we'll have Amarin, Hikma, Apotex, Teva & DR. A total of five players will not provide incentive for additional generics. If AMRN hopes to maintain its moat (assuming patent victory), it will have to redefine current formulation, discovery adjacent markets or buy out supply chain.

We're also losing time. With every passing month, the potential valuation of this firm will continue to diminish. JT and team need an execution plan NOW!